Skip to main content

Table 4 Regression Analysis of PTOPS scores on baseline socio-demographic and healthcare variables (n = 131)

From: Patient Satisfaction with private Physiotherapy for musculoskeletal Pain

Enhancer
Overall Model   r2 F value P value     
   0.040 5.334 0.022     
Predictor Variables Injury Site Age First time to attend PT* No. of PT sessions Gender Marital Status Profession/Degree GP referral to PT
Beta 0.200 -0.022 -0.102 0.155 -0.047 -0.116 -0.041 0.031
t-value 2.314 -0.243 -1.182 1.784 -0.540 -1.340 -0.467 0.354
significance 0.022 0.808 0.240 0.077 0.590 0.183 0.641 0.724
Detractor
Overall Model   r 2 F value P value     
   0.096 13.568 <0.001     
Predictor Variables Injury Site Age First time to attend PT* Number of PT sessions Gender Marital Status Profession/Degree GP referral to PT
Beta -0.063 -0.310 0.110 -0.044 0.147 0.131 -0.093 -0.036
t-value -0.718 -3.683 1.311 -0.517 1.707 1.415 -1.102 -0.425
significance 0.474 <0.001 0.192 0.606 0.090 0.159 0.273 0.671
Location
Overall Model   r 2 F value P value     
   0.096 13.568 <0.001     
Predictor Variables Injury Site Age First time to attend PT* Number of PT sessions Gender Marital Status Profession/Degree GP referral to PT
Beta 0.123 -0.034 -0.079 0.111 0.109 0.053 0.170 -0.057
t-value 1.307 -0.323 -0.872 1.222 1.142 0.537 1.839 -0.622
significance 0.194 0.747 0.385 0.224 0.256 0.592 0.068 0.535
Cost
Overall Model   r 2 F value P value     
   0.055 0.872 0.542     
Predictor Variables Injury Site Age First time to attend PT* Number of PT sessions Gender Marital Status Profession/Degree GP referral to PT
Beta -0.048 -0.078 0.064 -0.013 0.111 0.129 0.149 -0.059
t-value -0.502 -0.724 0.687 -0.143 1.140 1.279 1.584 -0.637
significance 0.617 0.470 0.494 0.886 0.256 0.203 0.116 0.525
  1. * PT = Physiotherapy