Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
13 Aug 2007 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
13 Aug 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Sophie Coleman |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
13 Aug 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
20 Aug 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Sophie Coleman |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
20 Aug 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
13 Nov 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Montserrat Núñez |
20 Nov 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Elaine Thomas |
21 Nov 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Katie Lorig |
23 Nov 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Marta Buszewicz |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
30 Apr 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Sophie Coleman |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
30 Apr 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
16 May 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Elaine Thomas |
20 May 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Montserrat Núñez |
26 May 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Marta Buszewicz |
14 Aug 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Sophie Coleman |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
14 Aug 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
1 Sep 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Sophie Coleman |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
1 Sep 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
8 Sep 2008 | Editorially accepted | |
8 Sep 2008 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2474-9-117 |
You can find further information about peer review here.