Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: The reliability of a 10-test package for patients with prolonged back and neck pain: could an examiner without formal medical education be used without loss of quality? A methodological study

Original Submission
19 May 2006 Submitted Original manuscript
23 May 2006 Author responded Author comments - Odd Lindell
Resubmission - Version 2
23 May 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
17 Jul 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ricardo Pietrobon
18 Aug 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Annette Bishop
23 Nov 2006 Author responded Author comments - Odd Lindell
Resubmission - Version 4
23 Nov 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 4
24 Nov 2006 Author responded Author comments - Odd Lindell
Resubmission - Version 5
24 Nov 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 5
2 Dec 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ricardo Pietrobon
15 Dec 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Annette Bishop
27 Mar 2007 Author responded Author comments - Odd Lindell
Resubmission - Version 6
27 Mar 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
3 Apr 2007 Editorially accepted
3 Apr 2007 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-8-31

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page