Peer Review reports
From: Reliability of lumbar spinal palpation, range of motion, and determination of position
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
5 Feb 2007 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
16 Mar 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - B. Kim Humphreys |
7 May 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Veronique Feipel |
15 Jun 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Cheryl Petersen |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
15 Jun 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
4 Jul 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - B. Kim Humphreys |
10 Jul 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Veronique Feipel |
17 Aug 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Cheryl Petersen |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
17 Aug 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
27 Sep 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jens Peter Bonde |
3 Oct 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Cheryl Petersen |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
3 Oct 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
12 Oct 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Cheryl Petersen |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
12 Oct 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
25 Oct 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Cheryl Petersen |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
25 Oct 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
26 Oct 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Cheryl Petersen |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
26 Oct 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
30 Oct 2007 | Editorially accepted | |
30 Oct 2007 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2474-8-103 |
You can find further information about peer review here.