Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18 Mar 2006 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 29 Mar 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Nick Guldemond |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 29 Mar 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 18 Apr 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Keith Rome |
| 8 May 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Margaret Wan Nar Wong |
| 6 Jul 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Karl Landorf |
| 1 Aug 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Nick Guldemond |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 1 Aug 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 30 Aug 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Keith Rome |
| 31 Aug 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Margaret Wan Nar Wong |
| 22 Sep 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anna Hart |
| 4 Nov 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Nick Guldemond |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 4 Nov 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 4 Nov 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Nick Guldemond |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 4 Nov 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 15 Nov 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anna Hart |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 1 Dec 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
| 1 Dec 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2474-7-93 |
You can find further information about peer review here.