Peer Review reports
From: Total knee arthroplasty: good agreement of clinical severity scores between patients and consultants
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
19 Sep 2005 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
30 Dec 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ian Douglas Learmonth |
1 Feb 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Marx |
15 Mar 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Gayle Walley |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
15 Mar 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
5 Apr 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Marx |
14 Jun 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Gayle Walley |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
14 Jun 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
7 Jul 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Gayle Walley |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
7 Jul 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
27 Jul 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Gayle Walley |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
27 Jul 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
28 Jul 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Gayle Walley |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
28 Jul 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
31 Jul 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
31 Jul 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2474-7-61 |
You can find further information about peer review here.