Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2006 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 31 Aug 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - James Woodburn |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 31 Aug 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 4 Oct 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Karen Lohmann Siegel |
| 9 Oct 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Keith Rome |
| 25 Oct 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - James Woodburn |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 25 Oct 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 10 Nov 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Keith Rome |
| 13 Nov 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Karen Lohmann Siegel |
| 4 Dec 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - James Woodburn |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 4 Dec 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 4 Dec 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - James Woodburn |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 4 Dec 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 15 Dec 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - James Woodburn |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 15 Dec 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| 20 Dec 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - James Woodburn |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 20 Dec 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Publishing | ||
| 21 Dec 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
| 21 Dec 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2474-7-102 |
You can find further information about peer review here.