Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
10 May 2005 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
28 Jul 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Keith Rome |
10 Aug 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Dieter Rosenbaum |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
4 Oct 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Nick Guldemond |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
4 Oct 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
8 Oct 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Keith Rome |
27 Oct 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Dieter Rosenbaum |
31 Oct 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Nick Guldemond |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
31 Oct 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
9 Nov 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Nick Guldemond |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
9 Nov 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
20 Dec 2005 | Editorially accepted | |
20 Dec 2005 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2474-6-61 |
You can find further information about peer review here.