Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: No bias of ignored bilaterality when analysing the revision risk of knee prostheses: Analysis of a population based sample of 44,590 patients with 55,298 knee prostheses from the national Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register

Original Submission
28 Nov 2002 Submitted Original manuscript
3 Dec 2002 Author responded Author comments - Otto Robertsson
Resubmission - Version 2
3 Dec 2002 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Dec 2002 Author responded Author comments - Otto Robertsson
Resubmission - Version 3
3 Dec 2002 Submitted Manuscript version 3
6 Jan 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Birgitte Espehaug
6 Jan 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ove Furnes
9 Jan 2003 Author responded Author comments - Otto Robertsson
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Jan 2003 Submitted Manuscript version 4
9 Jan 2003 Author responded Author comments - Otto Robertsson
Resubmission - Version 5
9 Jan 2003 Submitted Manuscript version 5
27 Jan 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Birgitte Espehaug
31 Jan 2003 Author responded Author comments - Otto Robertsson
Resubmission - Version 6
31 Jan 2003 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
5 Feb 2003 Editorially accepted
5 Feb 2003 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-4-1

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page