Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
30 Apr 2013 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
31 May 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Phil Page |
19 Jun 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mark Lidegaard |
19 Jul 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - David Behm |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
19 Jul 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
8 Aug 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mark Lidegaard |
14 Aug 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Phil Page |
2 Oct 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Birthe Thomsen |
18 Oct 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - David Behm |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
18 Oct 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
17 Dec 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Birthe Thomsen |
20 Dec 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - David Behm |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
20 Dec 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
30 Jan 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - David Behm |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
30 Jan 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
12 Feb 2014 | Editorially accepted | |
22 Feb 2014 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2474-15-52 |
You can find further information about peer review here.