Peer Review reports
From: Reproducibility of and sex differences in common orthopaedic ankle and foot tests in runners
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
15 Feb 2013 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
19 Feb 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Maarten P. Van der Worp |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
19 Feb 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
14 Oct 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Takashi Nagai |
17 Nov 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Angela Evans |
5 Feb 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Maarten P. Van der Worp |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
5 Feb 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
2 Mar 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Takashi Nagai |
16 Mar 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Angela Evans |
22 Apr 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Maarten P. Van der Worp |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
22 Apr 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
22 Apr 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Maarten P. Van der Worp |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
22 Apr 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
24 Apr 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Maarten P. Van der Worp |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
24 Apr 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
30 Apr 2014 | Editorially accepted | |
23 May 2014 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2474-15-171 |
You can find further information about peer review here.