Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Reproducibility of and sex differences in common orthopaedic ankle and foot tests in runners

Original Submission
15 Feb 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
19 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - Maarten P. Van der Worp
Resubmission - Version 2
19 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Oct 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Takashi Nagai
17 Nov 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Angela Evans
5 Feb 2014 Author responded Author comments - Maarten P. Van der Worp
Resubmission - Version 3
5 Feb 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
2 Mar 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Takashi Nagai
16 Mar 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Angela Evans
22 Apr 2014 Author responded Author comments - Maarten P. Van der Worp
Resubmission - Version 4
22 Apr 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 4
22 Apr 2014 Author responded Author comments - Maarten P. Van der Worp
Resubmission - Version 5
22 Apr 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 5
24 Apr 2014 Author responded Author comments - Maarten P. Van der Worp
Resubmission - Version 6
24 Apr 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
30 Apr 2014 Editorially accepted
23 May 2014 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-15-171

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page