Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Single-row vs. double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: clinical and 3 Tesla MR arthrography results

Original Submission
24 Jan 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
8 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Toshiaki Hirose
8 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Naomi Oizumi
11 Jun 2012 Author responded Author comments - Cosimo Tudisco
Resubmission - Version 4
11 Jun 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
14 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Naomi Oizumi
27 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Toshiaki Hirose
17 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Cosimo Tudisco
Resubmission - Version 5
17 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
24 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Kalbfleisch
3 Jan 2013 Author responded Author comments - Cosimo Tudisco
Resubmission - Version 6
3 Jan 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 6
5 Jan 2013 Author responded Author comments - Cosimo Tudisco
Resubmission - Version 7
5 Jan 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
10 Jan 2013 Editorially accepted
27 Jan 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-14-43

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page