Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 27 Feb 2013 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
| Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 9 | |
| 24 Aug 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Philip Stahel |
| 16 Sep 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Dhanasekara Raja Palanisami |
| 6 Nov 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Yuntong Zhang |
| Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
| 6 Nov 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 10 |
| 9 Dec 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Yuntong Zhang |
| Resubmission - Version 11 | ||
| 9 Dec 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 11 |
| Publishing | ||
| 17 Dec 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
| 26 Dec 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2474-14-368 |
You can find further information about peer review here.