Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 11 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 14 Apr 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Pim van Egmond |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 14 Apr 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 24 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anastasios Korompilias |
| 24 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - William Eward |
| 12 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Pim van Egmond |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 12 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 24 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anastasios Korompilias |
| 24 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - William Eward |
| 23 Nov 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Pim van Egmond |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 23 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 10 Dec 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anastasios Korompilias |
| 14 Dec 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - William Eward |
| 10 Jan 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Pim van Egmond |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 10 Jan 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 15 Jan 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
| 17 Jan 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2474-14-31 |
You can find further information about peer review here.