Skip to main content

Table 3 Methodological quality of included studies

From: The mid-term outcome of total ankle arthroplasty and ankle fusion in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review

Author

Year

Study design

Subject

Outcome

Analysis

Total consensus

  

Patient evaluation on clinical relevant time points (3)*

Evaluation outcome measures (8)

Eligibility criteria (10)

Response rate (12)

Outcome definitions (16)

Statistical analysis (21)

Data collection (22)

(0–14 points)

TAA

        

van der Heide et al.

2009

0

1

0

2

1

1

1

6

Schutte et al.

2008

2

1

1

2

2

1

1

10

Nelissen et al.

2006

2

0

1

2

2

1

1

9

San Giovanni et al.

2006

1

0

1

2

1

1

1

7

Doets et al.

2006

2

0

1

2

2

2

2

11

Carlsson et al.

2005

0

0

1

2

1

0

2

6

Bonnin et al.

2004

2

0

1

2

1

1

1

8

Anderson et al.

2003

2

1

1

2

1

1

1

9

Wood et al.

2000

0

0

0

2

1

0

1

4

Mean

        

7.8

Arthrodesis

         

Anderson et al.

2005

0

1

1

0

1

0

2

5

Kennedy et al.

2003

0

0

1

1

1

0

1

4

Shinomiya et al.

2003

0

0

1

2

1

0

0

4

De Palma et al.

2000

2

0

0

2

1

0

1

6

Lauge-Pedersen et al.

1998

0

0

0

2

0

0

1

3

Stranks et al.

1995

0

0

1

2

1

0

1

5

Moran et al.

1991

0

1

1

2

1

0

2

7

Sowa et al.

1989

0

0

1

1

1

0

1

4

Mean

        

4.8

  1. * = number between parentheses refers to descriptor of the methodological quality assessment system by Macdermid et al. [13].
  2. 0 = minimal 1 = intermediate and 2 = maximal score for methodological quality.
  3. Definition of each individual score is presented in Table 1.