Skip to main content

Table 2 Subject demographics

From: Effects and predictors of shoulder muscle massage for patients with posterior shoulder tightness

variable

Responsive (n = 21)

Nonresponsive (n = 8)

Gender (males:females)

6:15

2:6

Age (years)

55.3 ± 5.7

52.5 ± 7.8

Height (cm)

162.8 ± 6.8

165.4 ± 7.2

Weight (Kg)

65.4 ± 7.9

63.3 ± 5.8

Duration of symptoms

11.7 ± 3.4*

17.9 ± 4.8

Pre-Glenohumeral Internal rotation (°)

32.1 ± 9.5

26.1 ± 6.6

Post-Glenohumeral Internal rotation (°)

68.8 ± 12.1*

32.2 ± 10.8

Pre-slope (Kg/mm) for PDa

0.62 ± 0.11*

0.56 ± 0.09

Post- slope (Kg/mm) for PDa

0.42 ± 0.09*

0.52 ± 0.13

Pre- slope (Kg/mm) for IFb

0.63 ± 0.02*

0.48 ± 0.09

Post- slope (Kg/mm) for IFb

0.48 ± 0.07*

0.52 ± 0.10

Pre- slope (Kg/mm) for TMc

0.49 ± 0.15

0.48 ± 0.11

Post- slope (Kg/mm) for TMc

0.41 ± 0.13

0.39 ± 0.11

Pre-Flex-SFd

32.9 ± 2.5

32.5 ± 6.1

Post-Flex-SFd

43.3 ± 4.8*

38.2 ± 2.8

  1. PD a posterior deltoid; IF b infraspinatus; TM c teres minor
  2. FLEX-SF d Flexilever Scale of Shoulder Function.
  3. *: There were significant differences between 2 groups (P < 0.005)