Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
10 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
8 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Thomas Gross |
15 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Richie Gill |
3 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Walter van der Weegen |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
3 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
3 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Walter van der Weegen |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
3 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
29 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Richie Gill |
15 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Thomas Gross |
30 Oct 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Walter van der Weegen |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
30 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
21 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Richie Gill |
28 Nov 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Walter van der Weegen |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
28 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
7 Dec 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
13 Dec 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2474-13-247 |
You can find further information about peer review here.