Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
16 Apr 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
20 Apr 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Alice Kongsted |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
20 Apr 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
18 Jun 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gregory Hicks |
26 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kate Dunn |
30 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Toby Hall |
1 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - kika konstantinou |
31 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Alice Kongsted |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
31 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
31 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Alice Kongsted |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
31 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
31 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Alice Kongsted |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
31 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
24 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Toby Hall |
26 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - kika konstantinou |
30 Oct 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Alice Kongsted |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
30 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
7 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gregory Hicks |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
Publishing | ||
22 Nov 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
28 Nov 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2474-13-236 |
You can find further information about peer review here.