Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
13 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
20 Feb 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Benjamin Gantenbein |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
20 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
13 Mar 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Benjamin Gantenbein |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
13 Mar 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
24 May 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Lavagnino |
8 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Brendan Harley |
12 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Benjamin Gantenbein |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
12 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
12 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Benjamin Gantenbein |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
12 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
16 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Lavagnino |
24 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Brendan Harley |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
Publishing | ||
8 Nov 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
14 Nov 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2474-13-222 |
You can find further information about peer review here.