Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 25 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Domhnall MacAuley |
| 19 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carl Lombard |
| 20 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sally Lee |
| 14 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Suzanne Witjes |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 14 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 14 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Suzanne Witjes |
| 19 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carl Lombard |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 14 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 22 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carl Lombard |
| 28 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Suzanne Witjes |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 28 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 19 Dec 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carl Lombard |
| 9 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Suzanne Witjes |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 9 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 16 Feb 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 16 Feb 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2474-13-21 |
You can find further information about peer review here.