Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 21 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 7 Dec 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Dora Pascual-Salcedo |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| 3 Feb 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hector Chinoy |
| 9 Mar 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Aatke van der Maas |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 9 Mar 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 27 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Dora Pascual-Salcedo |
| 28 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hector Chinoy |
| 17 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Aatke van der Maas |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 17 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 13 Jul 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Aatke van der Maas |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 13 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 19 Sep 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 24 Sep 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2474-13-184 |
You can find further information about peer review here.