Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 12 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - sjan-mari van niekerk |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 12 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 15 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - sjan-mari van niekerk |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 15 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 7 Feb 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bruno da Costa |
| 9 Feb 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Prawit Janwantanakul |
| 29 Feb 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - sjan-mari van niekerk |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 29 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 17 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Prawit Janwantanakul |
| 19 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bruno da Costa |
| 26 Apr 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Catherine Trask |
| 16 May 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jack Wall |
| 20 Jun 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - sjan-mari van niekerk |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 20 Jun 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 21 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jack Wall |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 2 Aug 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 13 Aug 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2474-13-145 |
You can find further information about peer review here.