Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 22 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 9 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Keerati Chareancholvanich |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 9 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 11 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Keerati Chareancholvanich |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 11 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 30 Jan 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sattaya Rojanasthien |
| 29 Apr 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Matthijs Krijnen |
| 7 Jun 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Keerati Chareancholvanich |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 7 Jun 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 14 Jun 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Matthijs Krijnen |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 20 Jul 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 20 Jul 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2474-13-124 |
You can find further information about peer review here.