Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Should we consider Dupuytren's contracture as work-related? A review and meta-analysis of an old debate

Original Submission
20 Dec 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Dec 2010 Author responded Author comments - alexis descatha
Resubmission - Version 2
21 Dec 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
4 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ann Barr
15 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jane Fedorczyk
18 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Kietrys
8 Apr 2011 Author responded Author comments - alexis descatha
Resubmission - Version 4
8 Apr 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
4 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - alexis descatha
Resubmission - Version 6
4 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
12 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - alexis descatha
Resubmission - Version 8
12 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
16 May 2011 Editorially accepted
16 May 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-12-96

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page