Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 30 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gerolamo Bianchi |
| 2 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Isam Atroshi |
| 25 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Glenn Haugeberg |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 25 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 8 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gerolamo Bianchi |
| 11 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Isam Atroshi |
| 7 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Glenn Haugeberg |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 7 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 27 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Glenn Haugeberg |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 27 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 2 Apr 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 2 Apr 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2474-12-67 |
You can find further information about peer review here.