Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 15 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Francis DEGACHE |
| 22 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - eugene rameckers |
| 17 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Raoul Engelbert |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 17 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 20 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Francis DEGACHE |
| 30 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - eugene rameckers |
| 5 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Raoul Engelbert |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 5 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 8 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Raoul Engelbert |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 8 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| 15 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Raoul Engelbert |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 15 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 21 Mar 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 21 Mar 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2474-12-61 |
You can find further information about peer review here.