Evidence for validity and reliability of a french version of the FAAM

Table 2 Correlation coefficients between the FAAM-F (ADL and Sports subscales) and the SF-36 (physical and mental scales).

	ADL subscale FAAM-F	Sport subscale FAAM-F	ADL subscale FAAM original	Sport subscale FAAM original	ADL subscale FAAM diabetes	Sport subscale FAAM diabetes
Physical Functioning	0.85 (n = 104)	0.72 (n = 102)	0.84 (n = 151)	0.78 (n = 130)	0.61 (n = 83)	0.63 (n = 83)
Physical Component Summary	0.81 n = 100)	0.72 (n = 98)	0.84 (n = 151)	0.80 (n = 130)	0.71 (n = 83)	0.72 (n = 83)
Mental Health	0.26 (n = 102)	0.21 (n = 100)	0.18 (n = 151)	0.11 (n = 130)	0.32 (n = 83)	0.22 (n = 83)
Mental Component Summary	0.37 (n = 100)	0.29 (n = 98)	0.05 (n = 151)	-0.02 (n = 130)	0.29 (n = 83)	0.17 (n = 83)

The two middle columns (FAAM original) present the values found by Martin et al. with the original English version, 2005[6]. The two right columns (FAMM diabetes) show the values found by Martin et al. 2009, using the original English version on patients suffering diabetes mellitus[7].

ISSN: 1471-2474