Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 21 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 21 Jul 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - bryan conrad |
| 17 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Alejandro Espinoza |
| 17 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kirk McGilvray |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 15 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Ching-Lung Tai |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 15 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 26 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Alejandro Espinoza |
| 29 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - bryan conrad |
| 29 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kirk McGilvray |
| 9 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Ching-Lung Tai |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 9 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 9 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Ching-Lung Tai |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 9 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 10 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Ching-Lung Tai |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 10 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| 29 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Ching-Lung Tai |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 29 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Publishing | ||
| 1 Feb 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 1 Feb 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2474-12-33 |
You can find further information about peer review here.