Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 10 May 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 11 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Robert Borden Hopkins |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 11 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 3 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Inaki Imaz |
| 14 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lan T. Ho-Pham |
| 15 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Patrick Haentjens |
| 15 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Robert Borden Hopkins |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 15 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 18 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Patrick Haentjens |
| 29 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lan T. Ho-Pham |
| 5 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Inaki Imaz |
| 16 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Robert Borden Hopkins |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 16 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 23 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Robert Borden Hopkins |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 23 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 26 Sep 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 26 Sep 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2474-12-209 |
You can find further information about peer review here.