Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
14 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
5 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joy MacDermid |
7 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Isam Atroshi |
24 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Cecilia Mellstrand Navarro |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
24 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
26 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Cecilia Mellstrand Navarro |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
26 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
28 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joy MacDermid |
22 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Cecilia Mellstrand Navarro |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
22 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
28 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Cecilia Mellstrand Navarro |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
28 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
8 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Cecilia Mellstrand Navarro |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
8 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
20 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Cecilia Mellstrand Navarro |
Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
20 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 10 |
Publishing | ||
22 Jul 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
22 Jul 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2474-12-171 |
You can find further information about peer review here.