Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
24 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
28 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Lars L. Andersen |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
28 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
24 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Cesar Fernandez-de-Las |
19 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hilla Sarig Bahat |
19 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ruth Defrin |
15 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Lars L. Andersen |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
15 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
16 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Cesar Fernandez-de-Las |
31 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hilla Sarig Bahat |
1 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ruth Defrin |
3 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Lars L. Andersen |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
3 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
23 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ruth Defrin |
11 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Lars L. Andersen |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
11 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
22 Jul 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
22 Jul 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2474-12-169 |
You can find further information about peer review here.