Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
31 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
1 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Paul Peloso |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
1 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
24 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - H Groen |
31 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Keat |
25 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Elisabeth Lie |
6 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Paul Peloso |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
6 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
7 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Paul Peloso |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
7 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
10 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Elisabeth Lie |
27 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - H Groen |
6 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Paul Peloso |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
6 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
14 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Paul Peloso |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
14 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
15 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Paul Peloso |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
15 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
18 Jul 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
18 Jul 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2474-12-165 |
You can find further information about peer review here.