Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
18 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
4 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Eric Hegedus |
11 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ian Horsley |
15 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Christer Rolf |
21 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Edmund Soh |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
21 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
21 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Edmund Soh |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
21 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
3 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ian Horsley |
10 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Christer Rolf |
13 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Eric Hegedus |
8 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Edmund Soh |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
8 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
9 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Edmund Soh |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
9 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
10 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Edmund Soh |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
10 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
22 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Edmund Soh |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
22 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
24 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Edmund Soh |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
24 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
25 Jun 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
25 Jun 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2474-12-137 |
You can find further information about peer review here.