Peer Review reports
From: Comparison of 1.5T and 3T MRI scanners in evaluation of acute bone stress in the foot
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 17 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| 10 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Harri Sievanen |
| 27 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Craig Ranson |
| 5 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Markus Sormaala |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 5 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 17 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Craig Ranson |
| 28 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Harri Sievanen |
| 11 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Markus Sormaala |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 11 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 23 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Markus Sormaala |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 23 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| 28 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Markus Sormaala |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 28 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Publishing | ||
| 6 Jun 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 6 Jun 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2474-12-128 |
You can find further information about peer review here.