Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 16 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 5 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Fulvia Ceccarelli |
| 10 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ingrid Moller |
| 11 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carlo Perricone |
| 7 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Angela Cadogan |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 7 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 6 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ingrid Moller |
| 14 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carlo Perricone |
| 18 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Fulvia Ceccarelli |
| 15 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Angela Cadogan |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 15 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 24 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Angela Cadogan |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 24 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 26 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Angela Cadogan |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 26 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 28 May 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 28 May 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2474-12-119 |
You can find further information about peer review here.