Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
27 Oct 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
4 Dec 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ian Horsley |
14 Dec 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bernadette Murphy |
15 Dec 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stephen Perle |
27 Jan 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Wayne Hoskins |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
27 Jan 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
23 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stephen Perle |
25 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ian Horsley |
3 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bernadette Murphy |
27 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Wayne Hoskins |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
27 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
31 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Wayne Hoskins |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
31 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
8 Apr 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
8 Apr 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2474-11-64 |
You can find further information about peer review here.