Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Management of giant pseudomeningoceles after spinal surgery

Original Submission
25 Jun 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
27 Jun 2009 Author responded Author comments - Tsung-Jen Huang
Resubmission - Version 2
27 Jun 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 Aug 2009 Author responded Author comments - Tsung-Jen Huang
Resubmission - Version 3
28 Aug 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
20 Sep 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Raquel Gutierrez-Gonzalez
26 Sep 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Masato Tanaka
28 Sep 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bulent DUZ
19 Oct 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Frank Feigenbaum
18 Jan 2010 Author responded Author comments - Tsung-Jen Huang
Resubmission - Version 4
18 Jan 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
22 Jan 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Frank Feigenbaum
24 Jan 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Raquel Gutierrez-Gonzalez
24 Jan 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Masato Tanaka
19 Feb 2010 Author responded Author comments - Tsung-Jen Huang
Resubmission - Version 5
19 Feb 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
9 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Tsung-Jen Huang
Resubmission - Version 6
9 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
13 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Tsung-Jen Huang
Resubmission - Version 8
13 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Resubmission - Version 9
Submitted Manuscript version 9
17 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Tsung-Jen Huang
Resubmission - Version 10
17 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 10
Publishing
21 Mar 2010 Editorially accepted
21 Mar 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-11-53

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page