Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Citation analysis of orthopaedic literature; 18 major orthopaedic journals compared for Impact Factor and SCImago

Original Submission
20 Apr 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
28 Jun 2009 Author responded Author comments - Rudolf W. Poolman
Resubmission - Version 2
28 Jun 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
13 Jul 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Darren C Greenwood
15 Jul 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Argyro Fassoulaki
27 Jul 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eleanor Pullenayegum
27 Aug 2009 Author responded Author comments - Rudolf W. Poolman
Resubmission - Version 3
27 Aug 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
15 Sep 2009 Author responded Author comments - Rudolf W. Poolman
Resubmission - Version 4
15 Sep 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
23 Sep 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Darren C Greenwood
28 Sep 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Argyro Fassoulaki
30 Sep 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eleanor Pullenayegum
13 Oct 2009 Author responded Author comments - Rudolf W. Poolman
Resubmission - Version 5
13 Oct 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 5
23 Oct 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Argyro Fassoulaki
5 Nov 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Darren C Greenwood
11 Dec 2009 Author responded Author comments - Rudolf W. Poolman
Resubmission - Version 6
11 Dec 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
4 Jan 2010 Editorially accepted
4 Jan 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-11-4

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page