Peer Review reports
From: Responsiveness and minimal important differences after revision total hip arthroplasty
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
21 Aug 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
15 Oct 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Antonio Escobar |
29 Oct 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Felix Angst |
17 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Hon-Yi Shi |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
17 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
23 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Felix Angst |
26 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Antonio Escobar |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
3 Jun 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Felix Angst |
13 Jul 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Antonio Escobar |
11 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Hon-Yi Shi |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
11 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
11 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Hon-Yi Shi |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
11 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
11 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Hon-Yi Shi |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
11 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
12 Nov 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
12 Nov 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2474-11-261 |
You can find further information about peer review here.