Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 1 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Ulrik Röijezon |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 1 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 6 May 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Céline Lansade |
| 2 Jun 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ottar Vasseljen |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| 5 Jul 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Ulrik Röijezon |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 5 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 30 Jul 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ottar Vasseljen |
| 10 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Ulrik Röijezon |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 10 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 31 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Ulrik Röijezon |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 31 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
| 2 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Ulrik Röijezon |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| 2 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
| Publishing | ||
| 27 Sep 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
| 27 Sep 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2474-11-222 |
You can find further information about peer review here.