Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
1 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
1 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Ulrik Röijezon |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
1 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
6 May 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Céline Lansade |
2 Jun 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ottar Vasseljen |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
5 Jul 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Ulrik Röijezon |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
5 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
30 Jul 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ottar Vasseljen |
10 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Ulrik Röijezon |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
10 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
31 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Ulrik Röijezon |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
31 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
2 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Ulrik Röijezon |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
2 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
27 Sep 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
27 Sep 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2474-11-222 |
You can find further information about peer review here.