Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 21 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 23 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Kaia Engebretsen |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 23 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 25 May 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Wim Grooten |
| 31 May 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Danielle van der Windt |
| 23 Jun 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Kaia Engebretsen |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 23 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 21 Jul 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Danielle van der Windt |
| 25 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Kaia Engebretsen |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 25 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| 17 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Kaia Engebretsen |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 17 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
| 22 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Kaia Engebretsen |
| Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
| 22 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
| Publishing | ||
| 23 Sep 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
| 23 Sep 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2474-11-218 |
You can find further information about peer review here.