Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
9 Oct 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
5 Dec 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - David Hanley |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
5 Dec 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
31 Dec 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - shivani sahni |
5 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tania Winzenberg |
6 Jan 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - David Hanley |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
6 Jan 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
18 Jan 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - David Hanley |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
18 Jan 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
20 Jan 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - David Hanley |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
20 Jan 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
26 Jan 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - David Hanley |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
26 Jan 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
28 Jan 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
28 Jan 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2474-11-20 |
You can find further information about peer review here.