Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
6 Oct 2008 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
6 Oct 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Helen Razmjou |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
6 Oct 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
13 Nov 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Edward Fehringer |
10 Dec 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Moby Parsons |
29 Dec 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Tashjian |
16 Jan 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Helen Razmjou |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
16 Jan 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
16 Jan 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Helen Razmjou |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
16 Jan 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
1 Feb 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Tashjian |
10 Feb 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Moby Parsons |
21 Feb 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Helen Razmjou |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
21 Feb 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
24 Feb 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
24 Feb 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2474-10-26 |
You can find further information about peer review here.