Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 14 May 2008 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 26 May 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Rene Castien |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 26 May 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 29 May 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Rene Castien |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 29 May 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
| 18 Sep 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Moore |
| 12 Dec 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ronald Feise |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
| 22 Jan 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Rene Castien |
| Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
| 22 Jan 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
| 1 Feb 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ronald Feise |
| 10 Feb 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Rene Castien |
| Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
| 10 Feb 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 10 |
| Publishing | ||
| 12 Feb 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
| 12 Feb 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2474-10-21 |
You can find further information about peer review here.