Peer Review reports
From: A modified QuickDASH-9 provides a valid outcome instrument for upper limb function
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
18 Sep 2008 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
15 Oct 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - C. Philip Gabel |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
15 Oct 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
1 Dec 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lynda Doward |
15 Jan 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Ring |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
31 Jul 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - C. Philip Gabel |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
31 Jul 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
27 Oct 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Ring |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
26 Nov 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - C. Philip Gabel |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
26 Nov 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 10 | |
9 Dec 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - C. Philip Gabel |
Resubmission - Version 11 | ||
9 Dec 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 11 |
Publishing | ||
18 Dec 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
18 Dec 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2474-10-161 |
You can find further information about peer review here.