Peer Review reports
From: Is visual estimation of passive range of motion in the pediatric lower limb valid and reliable
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 21 Oct 2008 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 7 Nov 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Rami Rachkidi |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 7 Nov 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 13 Jan 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anna Mackey |
| 26 Jan 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Krause |
| 13 Mar 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Rami Rachkidi |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 13 Mar 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 28 May 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Krause |
| 8 Jun 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anna Mackey |
| 12 Jun 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Rami Rachkidi |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 12 Jun 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 29 Jun 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Rami Rachkidi |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 29 Jun 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 12 Oct 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
| 12 Oct 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2474-10-126 |
You can find further information about peer review here.