Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: a new technique
© Carmont and Maffulli; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 17 October 2006
Accepted: 28 February 2007
Published: 28 February 2007
Primary patellofemoral dislocations are common. In most patients, non-operative management produces satisfactory outcome. If the dislocation recurs after a trial of rehabilitation, operative intervention is considered, with the aim of restoring the soft tissue anatomy to normal. Ninety four percent of patients suffer a tear to the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) following a patellar dislocation.
We describe our transverse patella double tunnel technique to reconstruct the medial patellofemoral ligament using a free autologous gracilis or semitendinous graft.
Patellofemoral dislocations are common, and tend to occur with as a result of quadriceps contraction across a flexed, valgus knee with the weight bearing tibia externally rotated compared to the femur . The dislocation usually reduces spontaneously or with muscle relaxing drugs.
Once the normal relationship of the patellofemoral joint is restored, patients may begin their rehabilitation. Non operative management is the recommended option following primary patellar dislocation [2, 3]. Conservative management focuses on concentric exercises to strengthen the quadriceps, and especially the vastus medialis, to prevent further instability. If the dislocation recurs after a trial of rehabilitation, operative intervention is considered, with the aim of restoring the soft tissue anatomy to normal. Ninety four percent of patients suffer a tear to the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) following a patellar dislocation . These lesions have been classified according to there anatomic location by Nomura . In cadavers, MPFL reconstruction showed a significant reduction in lateral displacement and ligament load compared with medial transfer of the tibial tuberosity .
We describe our transverse patella double tunnel technique to reconstruct the medial patellofemoral ligament.
The tendons of semitendinosus and gracilis are harvested in the usual fashion [7, 8]. The tendon is debrided of muscle tissue, prepared with a Vicryl locking suture (Ethicon, Edinburgh) on both ends, sized using anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tunnel sizers, and stored within a moist swab.
The lateral and medial retinacula are sutured back to the patella using Vicryl, with further closure of subcutaneous tissues and skin. Routine dressings, bandages and a cricket pad splint are applied.
Post-operative mobilisation regime consists of full weight bearing in a cricket pad splint. After two weeks, all restrictions are removed and the patient is allowed to return to normal activities over the course of three months.
The medial side of the knee consists of three layers. The first layer consists of the deep or crural fascia forming a layer which invests sartorius but is superficial to gracilis and semitendinosus. The second layer forms the fibres of the superficial medial ligament. Here, anterior fibres pass upwards to blend with the vastus medialis, and posterior fibres run from the patella to insert at the medial epicondyle. The third deep layer forms the capsule of the knee joint. Vertically aligned fibres form the deep layer of the medial ligament or the middle capsular ligament to the mid portion of the medial meniscus and the tibia . The MPFL is 5 to 12 mm wide .
The MPFL is the major medial soft tissue restraint preventing lateral displacement of the distal knee extensor mechanism, contributing an average of 53% of the total force . The MPFL is located within the second layer of the knee, and it may have a role in the prevention of lateral excursion of the patella . Desio found similar values of 60% at 20° knee flexion . The ligament has a mean tensile strength of 208 N . The inferolateral to superomedial fibres of the MPFL only change in length by 1.1 mm during knee flexion from 0° to 90° . Patellar tracking is significantly affected by a lateral force in the absence of the MPFL, but returns to normal following reconstruction .
The remainder of the discussion focuses on reconstruction techniques. The semitendinosus and gracilis hamstrings are commonly harvested as grafts for soft tissue reconstructive procedures . Several different methods have been described to reconstruct the MPFL with hamstring graft, and variation also occurs between tunnel placement and graft fixation methods. The graft attachment points of the reconstructed of the MPFL are the superior patella for the lateral attachment and the superior aspect of the medial epicondyle for the medial attachment. Varying attachment points have been described but an area between the medial epicondyle and adductor tubercle is considered optimal [30, 31] however this may be difficult to identify in larger knees when using small incisions. Mountney has cadaverically compared different tunnel and anchoring techniques. A tendon graft in a blind tunnel in the femur has a tensile strength of 126 N and a through tunnel tendon graft has a tensile strength of 195 N, not significantly different to the original MPFL . Bioabsorbable interference screw and endobutton-post fixation have comparable strength when used in ACL reconstruction .
Ellera Gomes utilised a 2.5 mm horizontal tunnel within the patella, enlarged on the medial side to 3.2 mm for the initial 10 mm. The tendon graft was sutured into the patella tunnel and the medial graft was looped through the adductor magnus tendon and sutured onto itself .
Muneta performed MPFL reconstruction on patients with residual instability after medial transfer of the tibial tubercle. The hamstring graft tissue was passed through the second layer of the knee into a 4.5 mm drill hole in the middle of the patella to the centre of the patella. From here, the graft was anchored through an additional 3.2 mm hole to the superficial surface of the bone, being secured with a button. The femoral epicondyle insertion was fixed with a staple . Schock describes a double loop of semitendinosus passed through a single patella tunnel and anchored in place with button and suture material on the patella and a cancellous screw at the epicondyle . Fernandez describes anchoring a single strand hamstring graft with two 2.5 mm drill holes at the end of a 4.5 mm tunnel . In a technique recently described by Farr, a double strand of semitendinosus is used as a graft, with the medial ends sutured together, secured in a medial epicondyle tunnel and the lateral ends separated forming a V shape inserting onto the medial patella .
A recent series by Drez reports a 93% improvement in symptoms after MPFL reconstruction for patella instability. The hamstring tendon was doubled, the strands sutured together and then sutured under tension to the superomedial edge of the patella and the medial epicondyle. A second limb of tissue was then sutured to the tibial periosteum just below the joint line .
A study comparing the fixation of hamstring graft to the patella reported no difference between suturing to the patella periosteum and using a single tunnel to the centre of the patella . A similar method has recently been described by Nomura, with 66% giving excellent results at 3 years follow up .
The quadriceps tendon has been utilised to provide ligament tissue. The superficial layers of the quadriceps tendon have been folded medially, rerouted through the second layer of the knee and attached onto the medial epicondyle . The use of a bone block in addition to quadriceps tendon has also been described . One of the earliest described reconstruction techniques used a polyester ligament passed through a bone tunnel at the midline of the patella . Nomura prospectively reviewed the use of a mesh artificial ligament (Leeds-Keio) and a medial retinacular slip reconstruction, with 96% patients having excellent or good results .
One of the important aspects of any ligament reconstruction is the tension of the graft. Computational analysis has shown that small alterations in length and position of the graft can dramatically increase the force and pressure applied to the medial patellofemoral cartilage [31, 33]. To try to optimise graft tension, we, with other authors, recommend cycling the knee through its range of motion prior to fixation with the knee flexed at 20°. This aims to remove "give" from the graft prior to fixation. The graft was secured under adequate tension (qualitatively assessed) to act as a check rein, preventing patella subluxation.
Complications include impingement of the graft on the medial femur during flexion . This could be enhanced due to the use of a single thinner graft. In our method, the doubled graft should exert less stress on the femur during flexion because of increased area of contact during movement, thus minimising unpleasant impingement symptoms. Indeed, in more than 30 patients followed for at least 3 years we have never experienced this complication. Another benefit is the reduction of a medial stabilising force over a more natural thickness of tissue. Anatomical studies have shown the graft to be 5–12 mm wide. Single strand techniques utilise hamstrings of about 3.5 mm wide. This can be doubled over to give a thicker ligament, but may cause difficulty with the placement of a larger single tunnel within the patella. A larger patellar tunnel may increase the risk of joint penetration or patellar fracture . Our two tunnel technique allows a wide tendon graft but uses small tunnels, thus minimising these potential complications. Also as the tunnels traverse the entire width of the patella this technique may influence patella tilt.
We have described our technique of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. This double tunnel technique allows a wider ligament comprising of a double thickness of hamstring to be reconstructed, minimising graft impingement, without increasing the risks of patellar fracture compared to a single tunnel technique.
We would like to thank the Departments of Medical illustration for their assistance with this research. The patient has given their written consent for the photographic images used. There has been no funding for this study.
- Boden BP, Pearsall AW, Garrett WE, Feagin JA: Patellofemoral instability: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1997, 5: 47-57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nikku R, Nietosvaara Y, Aalto K, Kallio PE: Operative treatment of primary patellar dislocation does not improve medium term outcome. Acta Orthop. 2005, 76 (5): 699-704. 10.1080/17453670510041790.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Buchner M, Baudendistel B, Sabo D, Schmitt H: Acute traumatic primary patellar dislocation: long term results comparing conservative and surgical treatment. Clin J Sport Med. 2005, 15 (2): 62-66. 10.1097/01.jsm.0000157315.10756.14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sallay PI, Poggi J, Speer KP, Garrett WE: Acute dislocation of the patella; a correlative pathoanatomic study. Am J Sports Med. 1996, 24 (1): 52-60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nomura E: Classification of lesions of the medial patellofemoral ligament in patellar dislocation. Int Orthop. 1999, 23 (5): 260-3. 10.1007/s002640050366.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ostemeier S, Stukenborg-Colsman C, Hurschler C, Wirth CJ: In vitro investigation of the effect of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction and medial tibial tuberosity transfer on lateral patella stability. Arthroscopy. 2006, 22 (3): 308-319.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mologne TS, Friedman MJ: Arthroscopic anterior cruciateligament reconstruction with hamstring tendons: Indications, surgical technique and complications and their treatment. Surgery of the knee. Edited by: Scott WN. 2006, Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone, 648-651. 4Google Scholar
- Maffulli N, Leadbetter WB: Free gracilis tendon graft in neglected tears of the Achilles tendon. Clin J Sport Med. 2005, 15 (2): 56-61. 10.1097/01.jsm.0000152714.05097.ef.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Warren LF, Marshall JL: The supporting structures and layers on the medial side of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg. 1979, 61-A (1): 56-62.Google Scholar
- Reider B, Marshall JL, Koslin B, Ring B, Girgis FG: The anterior aspect of the knee joint. J Bone Joint Surg. 1981, 63-A (3): 351-356.Google Scholar
- Conlan T, Garth WP, Lemons JE: Evaluation of the medial soft tissue restraints of the extensor mechanism of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg. 1993, 75-A (5): 682-693.Google Scholar
- Feller JA, Feagin JA, Garrett WE: The medial patellofemoral ligament revisited: an anatomical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1993, 1: 184-186. 10.1007/BF01560202.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Desio SM, Burks RT, Bachus KN: Soft tissue restraints to the lateral patellar translation in the human knee. Am J Sports Med. 1998, 26 (1): 59-65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mountney J, Senavongse W, Amis A, Thomas NP: Tensile strength of the medial patellofemoral ligament before and after repair or reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg. 2005, 87-B: 36-40.Google Scholar
- Steensen RN, Dopirak RM, McDonald WG: The anatomy and isometry of the medial patellofemoral ligament. Implications for reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2004, 32 (6): 1509-1513. 10.1177/0363546503261505.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sandmeier RH, Burks RT, Bachus KN, Billings A: The effect of reconstruction of the patellofemoral ligament on patella tracking. Am J Sports Med. 2000, 28 (3): 345-349.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ahmad CS, Shubin Stein BE, Matuz D, Henry JH: Immediate surgical repair of the medial patellar stabilizers for acute patellar dislocation: a review of eight cases. Am J Sports Med. 2000, 28 (6): 804-810.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Steensen RN, Dopirak RM, Maurus PB: Minimally invasive "crescenteric" imbrication of the medial patellofemoral ligament for chronic patellar subluxation. Arthroscopy. 2005, 21 (3): 371-375.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Muneta T, Sekiya I, Tsuchiya M, Shinomiya K: A technique for reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament. CORR. 1999, 359: 151-155.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schock EJ, Burks RT: Medial Patellofemoral ligament reconstruction using a hamstring graft. Op Tech Sports Med. 2001, 9 (3): 169-175.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fernandez E, Sala D, Castejon M: Reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament for patella instability using a semiteninosus autograft. Acta Orthop Belg. 2005, 71: 303-308.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Drez D, Edwards TB, Williams CS: Results of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction in the treatment of patellar dislocation. Arthroscopy. 2001, 17 (3): 298-306.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mikashima Y, Kimura M, Kobayashi Y, Miyawaki M, Tomatsu T: Clinical reults of isolated reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament for recurrent dislocation and subluxation of the patella. Acta Orthop Belg. 2006, 72: 65-71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nomura E, Inoue M: Hybrid medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction using the semitendinous tendon for recurrent patellar dislocation: minimum 3 years follow up. Arthroscopy. 2006, 22 (7): 787-793.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Steensen RN, Dopirak RM, Maurus PB: A simple technique for reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament using quadriceps tendon graft. Arthroscopy. 2005, 21 (3): 365-370.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Burks RT, Luker MG: Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Techniques in Orthopaedics. 1997, 12 (3): 185-191.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Farr J, Schepsis AA: Reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament for recurrent patella instability. J Knee Surg. 2006, 19 (4): 307-316.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ellera Gomes JL: Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for recurrent dislocation of the patella: a preliminary report. Arthroscopy. 1992, 8 (3): 335-340.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nomura E, Horiuchi Y, Kihara M: A mid-term follow-up of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction using an artificial ligament for recurrent patella dislocation. The Knee. 2000, 7: 211-215. 10.1016/S0968-0160(00)00072-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Smirk C, Morris H: The anatomy and reconstruction of the patellofemoral ligament. The Knee. 2003, 10: 221-227. 10.1016/S0968-0160(03)00038-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bicos J, Carofino B, Andersen M, Schepsis AA, Fulkerson JP, Mazzocca A: Patellofemoral forces after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. J Knee Surg. 2006, 19 (4): 317-326.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ma CB, Francis K, Towers J, Irrgang J, Fu FH, Harner CH: Hamstring anterior cruciate reconstruction: a comparison of bioabsorbable interference screw and endobutton-post fixation. Arthroscopy. 2004, 20 (2): 122-128.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Elias JJ, Cosgarea AJ: Technical errors during medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction could overload medial patellofemoral cartilage. Am J Sport Med. 2006, 34 (9): 1478-1485. 10.1177/0363546506287486.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ellera Gomes JL, Marczyk LRS, de Cesar PC, Jungblut CF: Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstraction with semitendinous autograft for chronic patellar instability: a follow study. Arthroscopy. 2004, 20 (2): 147-151.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/8/22/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.