Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of the mixed-effects ANOVAs for the qualitative moderator variables on the effect sizes obtained from measures of behaviours in the posttest

From: Preventive physiotherapy interventions for back care in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis

Cluster / Moderator variable

k

d +

95% C. I.

ANOVA results

   

d l

d u

 

(A) Treatment characteristics:

     

Type of treatment:

    

Q B(2) = 1.29, p = .525

Postural hygiene (PH)

11

0.853

0.256

1.451

R 2 = 0.0

PH + Physiotherapy exercise (PE)

1

1.858

−0.114

3.831

Q W(10) = 247.72, p < .001

PH + Physical activity

1

0.316

−1.594

2.227

 

Type of postural hygiene:

    

Q B(2) = 6.16, p = .046

Acquisition of knowledge (AK)

4

−0.126

−1.135

0.884

R 2 = 0.0

AK + Posture training habits (PTH)

7

1.466

0.715

2.217

Q W(10) = 250.24, p < .001

AK + PTH + Stimulat. dynamic postures

2

0.820

−0.541

2.181

 

Teaching method of postural hygiene:

    

Q B(1) = 6.63, p = .010

Theoretical teaching (TT)

5

0.051

−0.751

0.853

R 2 = 0.033

TT + Practical teaching

8

1.378

0.764

1.992

Q W(11) = 259.97, p < .001

External agents:

    

Q B(1) = 0.85, p = .393

Yes

7

1.095

0.438

1.752

R 2 = 0.037

No

6

0.636

−0.088

1.360

Q W(11) = 235.80, p < .001

Parents as paraprofessionals:

    

Q B(1) = 0.16, p = .688

Parental involvement

2

0.642

−0.660

1.944

R 2 = 0.0

No parental involvement

11

0.931

0.383

1.478

Q W(11) = 283.70, p < .001

Teachers as paraprofessionals:

    

Q B(1) = 0.76, p = .383

Teacher involvement

4

1.258

0.252

2.265

R 2 = 0.0

No teacher involvement

9

0.719

0.043

1.395

Q W(11) = 283.97, p < .001

Mode of application:

    

Q B(2) = 1.04, p = .594

Indirect intervention

1

0.741

−1.354

2.837

R 2 = 0.0

Direct intervention

9

0.718

0.025

1.412

Q W(10) = 283.94, p < .001

Mixed intervention

3

1.427

0.239

2.616

 

(B) Methodological characteristics:

     

Use of pretest measures:

    

Q B(1) = 0.15, p = .702

Yes

12

0.915

0.392

1.439

R 2 = 0.0

No

1

0.542

−1.293

2.377

Q W(11) = 283.51, p < .001

Type of control group:

    

Q B(1) = 0.16, p = .688

Active control

2

0.642

−0.660

1.944

R 2 = 0.0

Nonactive control

11

0.931

0.383

1.478

Q W(11) = 283.70, p < .001

Evaluator blinding:

    

Q B(1) = 7.10, p = .008

Blinded evaluator

9

1.310

0.737

1.882

R 2 = 0.062

Not blinded evaluator (or not reported)

4

−0.125

−1.011

0.762

Q W(11) = 254.47, p < .001

  1. k: number of studies. d +: mean effect size. d l and d u: lower and upper confidence limits of the 95% confidence interval around the mean effect size. Q B: statistic for testing the significance of the moderator variable. Q W: statistic for testing the model misspecification. R 2: proportion of variance accounted for by the moderator variable. The statistical analyses here presented were carried out excluding the Méndez and Gómez’s (2001) d index of 13.033[20].