Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

TRAIL Death Receptor-4, Decoy Receptor-1 and Decoy Receptor-2 Expression on CD8+ T Cells Correlate with the Disease Severity in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

  • Atil Bisgin1,
  • Ender Terzioglu2,
  • Cigdem Aydin3,
  • Burcak Yoldas4,
  • Veli Yazisiz2,
  • Nilufer Balci5,
  • Huseyin Bagci3,
  • Reginald M Gorczynski6,
  • Cezmi A Akdis7 and
  • Salih Sanlioglu1Email author
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders201011:192

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-192

Received: 29 March 2010

Accepted: 27 August 2010

Published: 27 August 2010

Abstract

Background

Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune inflammatory disorder. Although the pathogenesis of disease is unclear, it is well known that T cells play a major role in both development and perpetuation of RA through activating macrophages and B cells. Since the lack of TNF-Related Apoptosis Inducing Ligand (TRAIL) expression resulted in defective thymocyte apoptosis leading to an autoimmune disease, we explored evidence for alterations in TRAIL/TRAIL receptor expression on peripheral T lymphocytes in the molecular mechanism of RA development.

Methods

The expression of TRAIL/TRAIL receptors on T cells in 20 RA patients and 12 control individuals were analyzed using flow cytometry. The correlation of TRAIL and its receptor expression profile was compared with clinical RA parameters (RA activity scored as per DAS28) using Spearman Rho Analysis.

Results

While no change was detected in the ratio of CD4+ to CD8+ T cells between controls and RA patient groups, upregulation of TRAIL and its receptors (both death and decoy) was detected on both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in RA patients compared to control individuals. Death Receptor-4 (DR4) and the decoy receptors DcR1 and DcR2 on CD8+ T cells, but not on CD4+ T cells, were positively correlated with patients' DAS scores.

Conclusions

Our data suggest that TRAIL/TRAIL receptor expression profiles on T cells might be important in revelation of RA pathogenesis.

Background

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease, which affects the synovial membrane and eventually causes irreversible destruction of tendons, cartilage, and bone [13]. It has long been suspected that the inflammatory lesions result from an autoimmune response to joint-specific antigens primarily involving the cells of the immune system [47]. Although disease commences with T cells recognizing antigen, this recognition event also drives a chronic inflammatory process involving the activation of macrophages and B cells [8, 9]. The chronic inflammation is in turn perpetuated by activation of both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells [10].

Programmed cell death is an apoptotic mechanism by which damaged cells are removed from the body. Engagement of autoreactive T cells by self antigens within the thymus induces deletion of potentially harmful T cells. Defects in apoptosis lead to the persistence of T cells recognizing self antigens which can induce autoimmunity [11, 12]. Clonally expanded T cells that have served their functional purpose are also cleared from the system through activation induced cell death (AICD) involving cell surface FasL/Fas receptor interaction [13]. Children with defective Fas-mediated T lymphocyte apoptosis exhibit a disorder known as autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome [14, 15]. Like FasL, TNF has also been involved in AICD [16], although unlike CD95, TNF initiates and exacerbates autoimmune diseases. A third member of TNF superfamily is the TNF Related Apoptosis Inducing Ligand (TRAIL) [17]. In the immune system, TRAIL is expressed on the surface of activated T lymphocytes. Five different receptors interact with TRAIL: TRAIL Receptor-1 (TRAIL-R1/also referred to as DR4), TRAIL Receptor-2 (TRAIL-R2/DR5), TRAIL Receptor-3 (TRAIL-R3/DcR1), TRAIL Receptor-4 (TRAIL-R4/DcR2), and osteoprotegrin (OPG) [18, 19]. DR4 and DR5 are the genuine death receptors inducing apoptosis whereas DcR1 and DcR2 function as decoy receptors and physiologically block apoptosis [20, 21], which might thus contribute to the pathogenesis of autoimmunity [22, 23]. Like CD95L, TRAIL has been reported to be a potent inhibitor of autoimmune arthritis [24]. Unlike TNF and FasL, TRAIL inhibits the activation and proliferation of lymphocytes in vivo, but does not delete them from the system.

It is apparent then that FasL, TNF and the TRAIL/TRAIL receptor system are involved in T cell activation and/or deletion [25]. Accordingly, here we demonstrate the potential usage of TRAIL and the expression profile of its receptors on peripheral T cell subsets as markers to monitor the prognosis of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Methods

Clinical Assessment of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

20 RA patients and 12 age-/sex-matched control individuals were enrolled in the study conducted at the Rheumatology Clinic of Akdeniz University Hospitals. RA patients were classified according to the American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria. DAS28-3 scoring (including tender joint counts, swollen joint counts and erythrocyte sedimentation rate-ESR) was used for each RA patient to assess the severity of disease. RA patients previously not treated with disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (anti-TNF agents) were admitted to the study. These patients had the history of receiving either non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or analgesics prior to analysis.

Collection and analysis of blood samples

Analysis of peripheral blood lymphocytes was performed by direct immunofluorescence flow cytometry using a Coulter EPICS ALTRA XL instrument. The following monoclonal antibodies (mAb) were used: Phycoerythrin (PE) anti-human DR4 (CD261, TRAIL-R1, Cat No: 12-6644-73, eBioscience Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), PE anti-human DR5 (CD262, TRAIL-R2, Cat No: 12-9908-73, eBioscience Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), PE anti-human DcR1 (CD263, TRAIL-R3, TRAILR3, LIT, TRID Cat No: 12-6238-73, eBioscience Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), PE anti-human DcR2 (CD264, TRAIL-R4, TRAILR4, TRUNDD, TNFRSF10 D Cat No: 12-6239-73, eBioscience Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), PE anti-human TRAIL (CD253 Cat No: 12-9927-73, eBioscience Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) anti-human CD4 (L3T4 Cat No: A07750, Beckman Coulter, Immunotech, Marseille, France), FITC anti-human CD8 (Cat No: IM0451U, Beckman Coulter, Immunotech, Marseille, France), PE Mouse IgG1 (κ Isotype Control Cat No: 12-4714-73, eBioscience Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), FITC Mouse IgG1 (κ Isotype Control Cat No: A07795, Beckman Coulter, Immunotech, Marseille, France) and FITC Mouse IgG2a (Isotype Control Cat No: 11-4724-73, eBioscience Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).

Flow Cytometry Procedure

Reaction conditions for FC were as follows: 50 μl of each sample was diluted with 50 μl PBS solution (phosphate buffered saline; 0.01 M sodium phosphate, 0.145 M sodium chloride, Ph 7.2), and stained using 10 μl of either FITC (Fluorescein isothiocyanate) conjugated mouse monoclonal antihuman CD4 antibody or FITC conjugated mouse monoclonal antihuman CD8 antibody. PE (Phycoerythrin) conjugated mouse monoclonal antihuman TRAIL or its receptor antibodies were added subsequently to each tube. Both the activation status of T cells (CD4+CD25+) and the amount of regulatory T cells (CD4+CD25+FoxP3+) present were revealed using CD25 ECD (Beckman Coulter, 6607112) and APC-anti-human Foxp3 (eBioscience, 17-4776-73) antibodies. Tubes were incubated in the dark at room temperature for 20 minutes. Erythrocytes were eliminated from PBL using ammonium chloride lysing solution. After two washes with PBS, the cells were resuspended and analyzed by flow cytometry. A calibration based on lymphocyte gating was performed on EPICS Altra XL system using CD45 fluorescence and side scatter parameters prior to analysis. The peripheral blood samples were analyzed within 6 hours so that the gate could still be drawn around lymphocytes. Isotype matched antibodies were included to control for non-specific binding. All results were analyzed using Expo32 Altra software (Beckman-Coulter, Fullerton, CA).

Ethics

Written informed consent relating to the Declaration of Helsinki was obtained from all patients. The study was approved by Akdeniz University Local Committee on Ethics.

Statistical Analysis

The statistical package for the Social Sciences 13.0 software for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Ill) and GraphPad Prism version 5 (La Jolla, CA, USA) were used to plot the data and perform statistical analyses. In addition, SmartDraw Health Science Edition (San Diego, CA, USA) was used as a graphics software package. Normality tests were conducted using a Shapiro-Wilk method. T cell subsets (CD4+ and CD8+ T cells) in both groups displayed a normal distribution. Thus, a nonparametric unpaired student's T test was used to evaluate CD4+/CD8+ T cell ratios. On the other hand, a Gaussian distribution was not observed between normal versus RA patients when analyzing TRAIL and TRAIL receptor expression profiles. For this reason, Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare CD4+ versus CD8+ T cell associated TRAIL marker expression in patients. All correlation analyses used Spearman's Rho tests.

Results

Flow Cytometric Analysis of Peripheral Blood T Lymphocytes

Given the heterogeneous nature of rheumatoid arthritis, and evidence for variation in the ratio of CD4+/CD8+ T cells changes in autoimmune diseases such as Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) [2628], we first characterized the composition of peripheral blood T cell subsets in RA patients using flow cytometry. Nonparametric unpaired student's T test was used to detect possible differences in the two T cell subsets between normal versus RA patients. As shown in Figure 1, no difference was detected in the ratio of CD4+ (p = 0.63) to CD8+ (p = 0.22) T cells between the two groups. We conclude that, unlike Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, disease status does not alter the ratio of CD4+ to CD8+ T cell subsets in RA.
Figure 1

Scatter dot plots of peripheral blood samples from 12 healthy control individuals and 20 RA patients showing the ratio of T cell subsets (CD4 + and CD8 + ) by flow cytometry.

Membrane bound TRAIL and its receptor expression profile on peripheral CD4+ T lymphocytes in RA patients versus control individuals

During the development of RA, CD4+ T cells initiate and regulate several cell-mediated immune processes that cause synovial inflammation and joint destruction in response to activation by antigen presentation. We next examined the CD4 + T lymphocyte associated cell-surface expression profile of TRAIL and its receptors isolated from either healthy volunteers or RA patients using flow cytometry. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the two groups. As shown in Figure 2A, CD4 + T cells obtained from RA patients exhibited higher levels of expression of TRAIL and its death/decoy receptors compared to cells from control individuals (p < 0.05). Representative flow cytometric analyses of CD4 + T cells isolated from a healthy individual and an RA patient are shown in Figure 2B, while Figure 2C indicates the relative increase in marker expression levels. These data show a 35-fold increase in DcR1 expression with a 10-15-fold increase in the other markers.
Figure 2

TRAIL and its receptor (both death and decoy) expression profile on CD4 + T cells. A scattered dot plot profile of TRAIL and its receptors is provided in Panel A. Solid circles indicate RA patients while dots represent control individuals. Error bars display mean (±) SEM. Representative flow cytometric analyses of a control individual (upper panels) and an RA patient (lower panels) are shown in Panel B, while Panel C shows the relative increase in TRAIL and its receptors on CD4+ T cells of RA patients compared to controls.

Using a Spearman Rho correlation test to evaluate correlations between expression of TRAIL and TRAIL receptors on CD4+ T cells in RA patients, we found increased DR4 expression was correlated with an increase in both DR5 and TRAIL (Table 1). In addition, DcR1 and DcR2 expression showed strong correlation (p < 0.01).
Table 1

Spearman rho correlation analysis of TRAIL and its receptors present on CD4+ T cells isolated from RA patients.

RA-CD4 Spearman's Rho

DR4

DR5

DcR1

DcR2

TRAIL

DR4

correlation Coefficient

1.000

.620(**)

.116

.255

.764(**)

 

Sig. (2-tailed)

.

.004

.626

.277

.000

 

N

20

20

20

20

20

DR5

correlation Coefficient

.620(**)

1.000

.470(**)

.416

.374

 

Sig. (2-tailed)

.004

.

.037

.068

.104

 

N

20

20

20

20

20

DcR1

correlation Coefficient

.116

.470(**)

1.000

.639(**)

.086

 

Sig. (2-tailed)

.626

.037

.

.002

.718

 

N

20

20

20

20

20

DcR2

correlation Coefficient

.255

.416

.639(**)

1.000

.414

 

Sig. (2-tailed)

.277

.068

.002

.

.070

 

N

20

20

20

20

20

TRAIL

correlation Coefficient

.764(**)

.374

.086

.414

1.000

 

Sig. (2-tailed)

.000

.104

.718

.070

.

 

N

20

20

20

20

20

** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

CD8+ T cell associated TRAIL and its receptor expression profile in RA

We next investigated the expression of TRAIL and its receptors on CD8 + T cells of RA patients and compared with healthy controls, similar to CD4 + T cells, we found significant differences between the two groups as shown in Figure 3A (p < 0.05). Representative FC data from a patient and control are shown in Figure 3B, with Figure 3C indicating the relative increase in CD8+ T cell associated TRAIL and its receptor expression. In this case increased DcR1 expression (about 66 fold) was the most marked. A correlation between CD8+ T cell associated TRAIL and receptor expression was investigated using Spearmen Rho Correlation analysis. As shown in Table 2, a correlation among the death and the decoy receptors as well as with TRAIL death ligand expression was observed.
Figure 3

Panel A: CD8 + T cell associated TRAIL and its receptor expression profile. TRAIL and its receptor expression profile of CD8+ T cells gathered from 20 RA patients and 12 healthy controls are shown as a scatter dot plot. Error bars represent mean (±) SEM. Panel B shows representative FC for TRAIL and its receptor expression on CD8+ T cells (upper panels show healthy control, lower panels are obtained from an RA patient). Panel C shows the relative increase in TRAIL and its receptors on CD8+ T cells on RA cells (vs control).

Table 2

Spearman rho correlation analysis of CD8+ T cell associated TRAIL and its receptors obtained from RA patients.

RA-CD8 Spearman's Rho

DR4

DR5

DcR1

DcR2

TRAIL

DR4

correlation Coefficient

1.000

.868(**)

.948(**)

.740(**)

.744(**)

 

Sig. (2-tailed)

.

.004

.000

.000

.000

 

N

20

20

20

20

20

DR5

correlation Coefficient

.868(**)

1.000

.784(**)

.738(**)

.632(**)

 

Sig. (2-tailed)

.000

.

.000

.000

.003

 

N

20

20

20

20

20

DcR1

correlation Coefficient

.948(**)

.784(**)

1.000

.773(**)

.689(**)

 

Sig. (2-tailed)

.000

.000

.

.000

.001

 

N

20

20

20

20

20

DcR2

correlation Coefficient

.740(**)

.738(**)

.773(**)

1.000

.525(*)

 

Sig. (2-tailed)

.000

.000

.000

.

.017

 

N

20

20

20

20

20

TRAIL

correlation Coefficient

.744(**)

.632(**)

.689(**)

.525(*)

1.000

 

Sig. (2-tailed)

.000

.003

.001

.017

.

 

N

20

20

20

20

20

** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

A non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test was administered to investigate statistical differences in expression levels between CD4+ and CD8+ T cell associated TRAIL and its receptors in patients with RA. Our results indicated that expression levels of TRAIL and its receptors were higher on CD8+ T cells (Figure 3A) than on CD4+ T cells (Figure 2A).

CD8+ T cell associated DR4, DcR1 and DcR2 expression levels correlated with DAS28 scores in RA patients

Finally we investigated evidence for a correlation between TRAIL and its receptor expression profile and the severity of disease in RA patients. Interestingly only CD8+ T cell associated (Figure 4) but not CD4+ T cell associated (data not shown) DR4, DcR1 and DcR2 expression levels correlated with DAS28 scores in RA patients.
Figure 4

Correlation between DR4 + (Panel A), DcR1 + (Panel B) and DcR2 + (Panel C) expression levels and RA disease activity (DAS28 Score)-Spearman Rho correlation analysis.

T cell activation status of newly diagnosed RA patients

CD25 is one commonly used marker for recently activated T cells [29]. In order to document the activation status of T cells in RA patients; another set of flow cytometry assay was conducted. As shown in Table 3, the percentage of CD4+CD25+ T cells was statistically higher in RA patients compared to control individuals. However, as shown before both activated and regulatory T cells (Treg) can express CD25 marker on the cell surface [30]. To distinguish these two, FoxP3 staining was employed as described in Materials and Methods. No difference was noted in the amount of Treg (CD4+CD25+ FoxP3+) between RA and control patients (Table 3).
Table 3

T cell activation marker profile and Treg status in RA versus healthy control patients.

Cell Subsets

RA

(% cell ± SD)

Control

(% cell ± SD)

p value

CD4+ CD25+

4,9 ± 2,9

3,1 ± 2,0

0,001

CD4+ CD25+ FoxP3+

0,8 ± 1,9

0,6 ± 0,4

0,259

Discussion

It has previously been reported that negative selection of T cells in the thymus is controlled by TRAIL [25]. For example, mice deficient in TRAIL had a severe defect in thymic deletion of T cells and were hypersensitive to collagen-induced arthritis [31]. Evidence for functional consequences of TRAIL over-expression in autoimmune diseases including rheumatoid arthritis has emerged from gene therapy studies [32]. Although TRAIL is not cytotoxic to normal cells [33], hyperplastic human RA synovial fibroblasts in culture and RA-activated rabbit synovial tissue in vivo were sensitive to adenoviral delivery of human TRAIL [34]. The effect of TRAIL expression on blood lymphocytes was reported to be different (killing versus suppression) than that observed with RA synovial cells. These studies suggested that TRAIL can inhibit the activation and proliferation of lymphocytes in vivo, but does not necessarily delete them from the system [35].

The TRAIL/TRAIL receptor system has recently been implicated as a disease activation marker in cancer. High DcR2 expression levels in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) indicate a poorer prognosis, with this marker strongly correlated with high Gleason Scores, Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) recurrence and decreased survival in PCa patients [36]. In patients with invasive ductal carcinoma, however, high levels of DR4 expression are positively correlated with tumor grade and with poor prognosis [37]. Two recent studies have linked high levels of endogenous TRAIL expression to increased cell death in human pancreatic tissue, supporting the idea that TRAIL might be implicated in the development of autoimmune diseases such as Type 1 Diabetes [38, 39]. Despite this information, there is no information concerning the profile of the TRAIL/TRAIL receptor system in the development of RA.

We analyzed peripheral blood lymphocytes of 20 RA patients and 12 control individuals by flow cytometry to detect their TRAIL/TRAIL receptor profile. T cell lymphocytes of healthy control individuals expressed low levels of TRAIL and TRAIL receptors on the cell surface. While this is in accordance with a study conducted by Lu et al. [40], Hasegawa et al. have shown that only DcR2 expression but no other TRAIL receptor expression was detectable on CD8+ T cells [41]. Differences between these studies including ours could be attributed to differences in monoclonal antibodies used. Nevertheless, both CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes of RA patients displayed higher levels of TRAIL and its receptors on the cell surface compared to healthy control individuals. Since PCa patients can be separated from patients with benign prostate hyperplasia by the amount of TRAIL/TRAIL receptor present in prostate tissue [42] our observations suggest that it might be useful to monitor TRAIL/TRAIL receptor expression in peripheral blood lymphocytes in RA patients at diagnosis and during the course of their disease. The most dramatic change in the amount of TRAIL/TRAIL receptor present on peripheral blood lymphocytes of RA patients was the increased DcR1 expression seen in both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Recently, elevated expression of DcR1 was detected in antigen specific T cells of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) [22]. These antigen specific T cell clones were also resistant to TRAIL mediated apoptosis. One interpretation of these data is that antigen specific T cell clones increase their survival following DcR1 upregulation.

Based on our flow cytometry analysis, RA patients displayed higher levels of activated T cells compared to healthy controls. This finding is in accordance with previous studies demonstrating the presence of higher levels of CD4+CD25+ peripheral blood lymphocytes in RA patients compared to healthy individuals [43, 44]. However we did not observe any change in the level of CD4+CD25+ FoxP3+ T cells between RA and control groups. In accordance with previous studies, no relationship was found between disease activity and CD4+CD25+ or CD4+CD25+ FoxP3+ T cells in RA patients [45]. Whether any subtle increase in TRAIL or TRAIL receptor expression observed on CD4+ T cells in RA patients is simply a consequence of T cell activation remains to be clarified.

Conclusions

Clinical evaluation of RA patients involves RA activity scoring (DAS28). Intriguingly, only the CD8+ T cell associated DR4, DcR1 and DcR2 expression levels correlated with DAS28 scores in patients with RA, implying that altered TRAIL receptor profiles on CD8+ T cell subsets rather than on CD4+ T cells is more important in terms of disease severity.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the grant from Akdeniz University Scientific Research Project Administration Division and Health Science Institute (2008.03.0122.001).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medical Genetics, Human Gene and Cell Therapy Center of Akdeniz University Hospitals and Clinics
(2)
Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Akdeniz University Faculty of Medicine
(3)
Department of Medical Biology and Genetics, Human Gene and Cell Therapy Center of Akdeniz University Hospitals and Clinics
(4)
Human Gene and Cell Therapy Center of Akdeniz University Hospitals and Clinics
(5)
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Akdeniz University Faculty of Medicine
(6)
Division of Cellular & Molecular Biology, Toronto Hospital, University Health Network
(7)
Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research

References

  1. Koch AE: Review: angiogenesis: implications for rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1998, 41 (6): 951-962. 10.1002/1529-0131(199806)41:6<951::AID-ART2>3.0.CO;2-D.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Walsh DA: Angiogenesis and arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 1999, 38 (2): 103-112. 10.1093/rheumatology/38.2.103.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Yin G, Liu W, An P, Li P, Ding I, Planelles V, Schwarz EM, Min W: Endostatin gene transfer inhibits joint angiogenesis and pannus formation in inflammatory arthritis. Mol Ther. 2002, 5 (5 Pt 1): 547-554. 10.1006/mthe.2002.0590.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Panayi GS: T-cell-dependent pathways in rheumatoid arthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 1997, 9 (3): 236-240. 10.1097/00002281-199705000-00010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Weyand CM, Goronzy JJ: Pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Med Clin North Am. 1997, 81 (1): 29-55. 10.1016/S0025-7125(05)70504-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Nepom GT: Major histocompatibility complex-directed susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis. Adv Immunol. 1998, 68: 315-332. full_text.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Koetz K, Bryl E, Spickschen K, O'Fallon WM, Goronzy JJ, Weyand CM: T cell homeostasis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97 (16): 9203-9208. 10.1073/pnas.97.16.9203.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Weyand CM, Goronzy JJ: T-cell-targeted therapies in rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2006, 2 (4): 201-210. 10.1038/ncprheum0142.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Smolen JS: What is the place of recently approved T cell-targeted and B cell-targeted therapies in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis? Lessons from global clinical trials. J Rheumatol Suppl. 2007, 79: 15-20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lefkowitz DL, Lefkowitz SS: Macrophage-neutrophil interaction: a paradigm for chronic inflammation revisited. Immunol Cell Biol. 2001, 79 (5): 502-506. 10.1046/j.1440-1711.2001.01020.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Stuart L, Hughes J: Apoptosis and autoimmunity. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002, 17 (5): 697-700. 10.1093/ndt/17.5.697.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Marleau AM, Sarvetnick N: T cell homeostasis in tolerance and immunity. J Leukoc Biol. 2005, 78 (3): 575-584. 10.1189/jlb.0105050.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Singer GG, Carrera AC, Marshak-Rothstein A, Martinez C, Abbas AK: Apoptosis, Fas and systemic autoimmunity: the MRL-lpr/lpr model. Curr Opin Immunol. 1994, 6 (6): 913-920. 10.1016/0952-7915(94)90013-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Fisher GH, Rosenberg FJ, Straus SE, Dale JK, Middleton LA, Lin AY, Strober W, Lenardo MJ, Puck JM: Dominant interfering Fas gene mutations impair apoptosis in a human autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome. Cell. 1995, 81 (6): 935-946. 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90013-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Drappa J, Vaishnaw AK, Sullivan KE, Chu JL, Elkon KB: Fas gene mutations in the Canale-Smith syndrome, an inherited lymphoproliferative disorder associated with autoimmunity. N Engl J Med. 1996, 335 (22): 1643-1649. 10.1056/NEJM199611283352204.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lawrence CP, Chow SC: FADD deficiency sensitises Jurkat T cells to TNF-alpha-dependent necrosis during activation-induced cell death. FEBS Lett. 2005, 579 (28): 6465-6472. 10.1016/j.febslet.2005.10.041.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Sanlioglu AD, Koksal T, Baykara M, Luleci G, Karacay B, Sanlioglu S: Current progress in adenovirus mediated gene therapy for patients with prostate carcinoma. Gene Ther Mol Biol. 2003, 7: 113-133.Google Scholar
  18. Griffith TS, Lynch DH: TRAIL: a molecule with multiple receptors and control mechanisms. Curr Opin Immunol. 1998, 10 (5): 559-563. 10.1016/S0952-7915(98)80224-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Sanlioglu AD, Koksal IT, Karacay B, Baykara M, Luleci G, Sanlioglu S: Adenovirus-mediated IKKbetaKA expression sensitizes prostate carcinoma cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Cancer Gene Ther. 2006, 13 (1): 21-31. 10.1038/sj.cgt.7700877.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Griffith TS, Rauch CT, Smolak PJ, Waugh JY, Boiani N, Lynch DH, Smith CA, Goodwin RG, Kubin MZ: Functional analysis of TRAIL receptors using monoclonal antibodies. J Immunol. 1999, 162 (5): 2597-2605.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Sanlioglu AD, Karacay B, Koksal IT, Griffith TS, Sanlioglu S: DcR2 (TRAIL-R4) siRNA and adenovirus delivery of TRAIL (Ad5hTRAIL) break down in vitro tumorigenic potential of prostate carcinoma cells. Cancer Gene Ther. 2007, 14 (12): 976-984. 10.1038/sj.cgt.7701087.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Wendling U, Walczak H, Dorr J, Jaboci C, Weller M, Krammer PH, Zipp F: Expression of TRAIL receptors in human autoreactive and foreign antigen-specific T cells. Cell Death Differ. 2000, 7 (7): 637-644. 10.1038/sj.cdd.4400692.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Dirice E, Sanlioglu AD, Kahraman S, Ozturk S, Balci MK, Omer A, Griffith TS, Sanlioglu S: Adenovirus-mediated TRAIL gene (Ad5hTRAIL) delivery into pancreatic islets prolongs normoglycemia in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Hum Gene Ther. 2009, 20 (10): 1177-1189. 10.1089/hum.2009.039.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Song K, Chen Y, Goke R, Wilmen A, Seidel C, Goke A, Hilliard B, Chen Y: Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) is an inhibitor of autoimmune inflammation and cell cycle progression. J Exp Med. 2000, 191 (7): 1095-1104. 10.1084/jem.191.7.1095.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Tsokos GC, Tsokos M: The TRAIL to arthritis. J Clin Invest. 2003, 112 (9): 1315-1317.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Maeda N, Sekigawa I, Iida N, Matsumoto M, Hashimoto H, Hirose S: Relationship between CD4+/CD8+ T cell ratio and T cell activation in systemic lupus erythematosus. Scand J Rheumatol. 1999, 28 (3): 166-170. 10.1080/03009749950154248.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Matsushita M, Hayashi T, Ando S, Sekigawa I, Iida N, Hashimoto H, Hirose S: Changes of CD4/CD8 ratio and interleukin-16 in systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Rheumatol. 2000, 19 (4): 270-274. 10.1007/PL00011171.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang H, Xu J, Ji X, Yang X, Sun K, Liu X, Shen Y: The abnormal apoptosis of T cell subsets and possible involvement of IL-10 in systemic lupus erythematosus. Cell Immunol. 2005, 235 (2): 117-121. 10.1016/j.cellimm.2005.08.031.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Cao D, Malmstrom V, Baecher-Allan C, Hafler D, Klareskog L, Trollmo C: Isolation and functional characterization of regulatory CD25brightCD4+ T cells from the target organ of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Eur J Immunol. 2003, 33 (1): 215-223. 10.1002/immu.200390024.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Baecher-Allan C, Brown JA, Freeman GJ, Hafler DA: CD4+CD25high regulatory cells in human peripheral blood. J Immunol. 2001, 167 (3): 1245-1253.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Lamhamedi-Cherradi SE, Zheng SJ, Maguschak KA, Peschon J, Chen YH: Defective thymocyte apoptosis and accelerated autoimmune diseases in TRAIL-/- mice. Nat Immunol. 2003, 4 (3): 255-260. 10.1038/ni894.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Terzioglu E, Bisgin A, Sanlioglu AD, Ulker M, Yazisiz V, Tuzuner S, Sanlioglu S: Concurrent gene therapy strategies effectively destroy synoviocytes of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007, 46 (5): 783-789. 10.1093/rheumatology/kel448.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Aydin C, Sanlioglu AD, Karacay B, Ozbilim G, Dertsiz L, Ozbudak O, Akdis CA, Sanlioglu S: Decoy receptor-2 small interfering RNA (siRNA) strategy employing three different siRNA constructs in combination defeats adenovirus-transferred tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand resistance in lung cancer cells. Hum Gene Ther. 2007, 18 (1): 39-50. 10.1089/hum.2006.111.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Yao Q, Wang S, Gambotto A, Glorioso JC, Evans CH, Robbins PD, Ghivizzani SC, Oligino TJ: Intra-articular adenoviral-mediated gene transfer of trail induces apoptosis of arthritic rabbit synovium. Gene Ther. 2003, 10 (12): 1055-1060. 10.1038/sj.gt.3301881.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Liu Z, Xu X, Hsu HC, Tousson A, Yang PA, Wu Q, Liu C, Yu S, Zhang HG, Mountz JD: CII-DC-AdTRAIL cell gene therapy inhibits infiltration of CII-reactive T cells and CII-induced arthritis. J Clin Invest. 2003, 112 (9): 1332-1341.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Koksal IT, Sanlioglu AD, Karacay B, Griffith TS, Sanlioglu S: Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis inducing ligand-R4 decoy receptor expression is correlated with high Gleason scores, prostate-specific antigen recurrence, and decreased survival in patients with prostate carcinoma. Urol Oncol. 2008, 26 (2): 158-165.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Sanlioglu AD, Korcum AF, Pestereli E, Erdogan G, Karaveli S, Savas B, Griffith TS, Sanlioglu S: TRAIL death receptor-4 expression positively correlates with the tumor grade in breast cancer patients with invasive ductal carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007, 69 (3): 716-723. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.03.057.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Sanlioglu AD, Dirice E, Elpek O, Korcum AF, Balci MK, Omer A, Griffith TS, Sanlioglu S: High levels of endogenous tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand expression correlate with increased cell death in human pancreas. Pancreas. 2008, 36 (4): 385-393. 10.1097/MPA.0b013e318158a4e5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Sanlioglu AD, Dirice E, Elpek O, Korcum AF, Ozdogan M, Suleymanlar I, Balci MK, Griffith TS, Sanlioglu S: High TRAIL Death Receptor 4 and Decoy Receptor 2 Expression Correlates With Significant Cell Death in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Patients. Pancreas. 2009, 38 (2): 154-160. 10.1097/MPA.0b013e31818db9e3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Lum JJ, Pilon AA, Sanchez-Dardon J, Phenix BN, Kim JE, Mihowich J, Jamison K, Hawley-Foss N, Lynch DH, Badley AD: Induction of cell death in human immunodeficiency virus-infected macrophages and resting memory CD4 T cells by TRAIL/Apo2l. J Virol. 2001, 75 (22): 11128-11136. 10.1128/JVI.75.22.11128-11136.2001.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Hasegawa H, Yamada Y, Harasawa H, Tsuji T, Murata K, Sugahara K, Tsuruda K, Masuda M, Takasu N, Kamihira S: Restricted expression of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand receptor 4 in human peripheral blood lymphocytes. Cell Immunol. 2004, 231 (1-2): 1-7. 10.1016/j.cellimm.2004.11.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Sanlioglu AD, Koksal IT, Ciftcioglu A, Baykara M, Luleci G, Sanlioglu S: Differential expression of TRAIL and its receptors in benign and malignant prostate tissues. J Urol. 2007, 177 (1): 359-364. 10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.087.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Ehrenstein MR, Evans JG, Singh A, Moore S, Warnes G, Isenberg DA, Mauri C: Compromised function of regulatory T cells in rheumatoid arthritis and reversal by anti-TNFalpha therapy. J Exp Med. 2004, 200 (3): 277-285. 10.1084/jem.20040165.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. van Amelsfort JM, Jacobs KM, Bijlsma JW, Lafeber FP, Taams LS: CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cells in rheumatoid arthritis: differences in the presence, phenotype, and function between peripheral blood and synovial fluid. Arthritis Rheum. 2004, 50 (9): 2775-2785. 10.1002/art.20499.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Han GM, O'Neil-Andersen NJ, Zurier RB, Lawrence DA: CD4+CD25high T cell numbers are enriched in the peripheral blood of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Cell Immunol. 2008, 253 (1-2): 92-101. 10.1016/j.cellimm.2008.05.007.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/11/192/prepub

Copyright

© Bisgin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement