Table 2 Comparison between gold standard and SFR
From: Reliability of thoracolumbar burst fracture classification in the Swedish Fracture Register
Gold standard | SFR | Gold standard | SFR | Gold standard | SFR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Overall | Non-operative | Operative | ||||
277 | 167 | 110 | ||||
Th10 | 3 (1%) | 3 (1%) | 2 (1%) | 2 (1%) | 1 (1%) | 1 (1%) |
Th11 | 8 (3%) | 11 (4%) | 5 (3%) | 7 (4%) | 3 (3%) | 4 (4%) |
Th12 | 63 (23%) | 64 (23%) | 45 (27%) | 44 (26%) | 18 (17%) | 20 (18%) |
L1 | 125 (45%) | 126 (45%) | 68 (41%) | 68 (41%) | 57 (53%) | 58 (53%) |
L2 | 48 (17%) | 45 (16%) | 27 (16%) | 26 (16%) | 21 (19%) | 19 (17%) |
L3 | 28 (10%) | 28 (10%) | 20 (12%) | 20 (12%) | 8 (7%) | 8 (7%) |
Burst fracture | 241 (87%) | 277 (100%) | 137 (82%) | 167 (100%) | 104 (95%) | 110 (100%) |
Not burst fracture | 36 (13%) | 0 (0%) | 30 (18%) | 0 (0%) | 6 (5%) | 0 (0%) |
A1 | 28 (10%) | 0 (0%) | 25 (15%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (3%) | 0 (0%) |
A2 | 4 (1%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (2%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
A3/4 | 241 (87%) | 277 (100%) | 137 (82%) | 167 (100%) | 104 (95%) | 110 (100%) |
A3 | 115 (42%) | - | 87 (52%) | - | 28 (25%) | - |
A4 | 126 (45%) | - | 50 (30%) | - | 76 (69%) | - |
Other | 4 (1%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (1%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (3%) | 0 (0%) |
B0 | 233 (84%) | 148 (53%) | 159 (95%) | 120 (72%) | 74 (67%) | 28 (25%) |
B1 | 1 (0%) | 52 (19%) | 0 (0%) | 10 (6%) | 1 (1%) | 42 (38%) |
B2 | 43 (16%) | 38 (14%) | 8 (5%) | 9 (5%) | 35 (32%) | 29 (26%) |
BX | 0 (0%) | 39 (14%) | 0 (0%) | 28 (17%) | 0 (0%) | 11 (10%) |
C1 | 2 (1%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (1%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (1%) | 0 (0%) |
C2/3 | 1 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (1%) | 0 (0%) |